|
Links, Writings, and
Information
Artist statement
Equipment used
Writings
Printing, matting, framing
Useful links
Contact
information
HOME
|
A Mini-Review of Multimedia Programs
Update September 3, 2005-Photo to Movie added
It is a very exciting time we live in for artistic creation.
In particular I find it very exciting when blending photographic media with
sound and motion that is available through digital technology. While
not yet embarking on full video/movie production, I find the process of
presenting photographic art with accompanying musical tracks and video
motion to be quite enjoyable. Recently, I have been working on a
portfolio soon to be released. While producing the multimedia portion
of the portfolio I had an opportunity to give 3 programs a fairly good
run-through. I have had very good experience with Pro-Show Gold and
wanted to revisit the capabilities of Windows Movie Maker and
QuickTime Pro.
As with any software program, I am sure I have only scratched the surface of
what each of these programs can accomplish. But I do believe that my
experience is representative of what most artists would find given the
normal time limitations that daily living presents.
I first visited the free and already accessible Windows Movie Maker (WMM)
in the Windows XP operating system. The interface was
quite enjoyable and easy to pick up after my experience with ProShow Gold.
As with most Windows products, there are opportunities to let the software
put the entire show together for you. I prefer to have more individual
control and did not like any of the "automated" shows that WMM had produced.
Like ProShow Gold, WMM presents an interface where the user can simply drag
and drop contents onto the timeline. Users can import video, image,
and audio files. There are a myriad of transitions and video effects
available. This is the strong suit for WMM. The transitions are
quite nice and the video effects provide the artist with a great many tools
for making a unique presentation. I give the nod to WMM when it comes
to providing creative tools to make an enjoyable presentation while in the
preview mode of the software. But looking good in preview is one
thing, producing high quality output is another. What is most
important is how the presentation looks when downloaded by the audience.
This is where WMM simply failed to produce the quality I was seeking.
The playback was smooth with transitions flawless, but the color management
in the software dramatically altered color and gamma of the photographs.
The audio track was very "tinny" and lacked the robustness of the original.
I saved the produced show with varying levels of quality from the highest to
lowest. Even the highest level of output was clearly inferior to
ProShow Gold. The WMM files are playable in Windows Media Player.
When the final productions were compared, ProShow Gold had more accuracy
with regards to color and gamma of the photographs and produced a much more
robust audio track compared to WMM.
(Knowing that the Windows Media Player file is inferior, I still
wanted to post it for your information.
So here is the file.)
I have found ProShow Gold to be an incredible piece of software. The
user interface is extremely intuitive. I have also found a great deal
of flexibility with regards to the file types that one can import. The
final output video is identical to the preview mode. The DVD authoring
interface is remarkable with the capability to include multiple shows onto
one DVD. The features are limitless and I have probably only scratched
the surface. What is really amazing is the quality video that is
produced with relatively small files. The file produced with WMM on a
3 minute video was approximately 7mb at the highest quality level. The
same file is approximately 4mb with ProShow Gold. The quality
difference between the WVMM and ProShow Gold is not even close with the ProShow file clearly
superior in every way. There are only two downsides to ProShow Gold in
my experience. One is that I have never been able to access my account
at the "online sharing" gallery provided by the company. I have been
able to upload produced shows via the software, but for some reason I am
unable to access my shows when I log on to my account. The other
downside is that your audience will need to download the ProShow previewer
to view content on the web. This is a 2mb download and does not work
on Macs as far as I can tell. Given the limitation of sharing content
only with Windows users, I sat out to find a production file compatible with
MACs.
(Here is
the ProShow Gold file. Remember to download the previewer and this
is only for Windows machines.)
QuickTime Pro is the software that I often see referred to by others making
slide presentations. Now, let me state up front that I am no expert on
QuickTime, as a matter of fact I am not even a novice. The software
seems to have many tremendous capabilities for the movie producer capturing
their own sound and video files. I went to the Apple store and
downloaded what I thought would be the best option for my project and that
was QuickTime 7.0 which is in Windows preview release at the present time.
I purchased the Pro license and began to work on the slide presentation.
Based on my limited experience, the software has very limited usefulness for
slide presentations. The artist is instructed to post all images to be
included in a separate folder and then name each file with a sequential
number so that the software can produce the slide show automatically.
Once the artist instructs the programs to import the sequential files he/she
is prompted to input the display time for each image and that is it.
From my understanding that is all of the user input there is with regards to
the construction of the presentation. Unfortunately, QuickTime Pro 7.0
did not prompt me for the display time and my show lasts about .000003
seconds. In hindsight I should have gone with QuickTime 6.0, but I am
not willing to spend another $30 for the Pro license for that software.
QuickTime Pro may be a quick and easy solution for Mac users, but it
certainly lacks in features when compared to ProShow Gold or even WMM.
I have no experience with other Mac software.
So after an investment of a few hours of time in experimenting with two new
programs, I found myself returning to the comfortable old friend I have in
ProShow Gold. The software interface and creative possibilities are
endless with an extremely high quality final output.
ProShow Gold wins
easily in my brief review. If you have another multimedia program I
should consider (I did review Adobe Premier when it was first released and
found the file sizes to be exorbitant for my purposes of simple slide
creation), please drop me a line. The most important feature I need at
the present time is a program that can produce a file format compatible with
Windows and Mac systems. Until I find the software that can do that, I
am satisfied with ProShow Gold with my apologies to Mac users for not having
a compatible file format.
UPDATE September 3, 2005-Photo to Movie
Today Michael Reichmann posted a review of another multimedia program-Photo
to Movie. It sounded very promising as the program will
export to QuickTime and Windows Media Player formats. This seemed to
be the magic bullet. Now, let me state up front that I have spent a
total of 30 minutes with the program this morning, so I am far from an
expert. The interface is a breeze, especially if you have prior
experience with other multimedia programs. Simply drag and drop the
content onto the timeline. The big advantage is the ability to export
to QuickTime and Window Media Player files. Finally an option that can
be viewed across multiple platforms. I transported the images and
soundtrack from my "Light of Creation" portfolio presentation into the
program. The default is to pan and scan the images slightly which I
did not want. I checked "no motion" in the properties dialogue, but
some images still have motion. There are multiple output size options
depending on you intended use. My intentions were to use the video as
a preview of the prints in the "Light of Creation" portfolio. So I
selected "output to web" at the "highest quality." The file size is
20mb and the playback quality is small and not very smooth. So after a
very brief play with Photo to Movie, I once again am back to ProShow Gold as
my primary source for generating video content for web purposes. Even
though the playback requires a download of the ProShow viewer and is limited
to Windows, the playback quality of ProShow Gold is astounding for the file
size generated.
(Here is a link to the Photo to Movie file.
It is watermarked since it was a trial version and is a 20mb download)
|