Two and Three Quarter Years

Alain emphasizes in his writings and workshops the importance of returning to locations in order to explore new creative possibilities.  Many may say "ah, what the heck, I have been there and shot that."  But I tend to listen to Alain and take his advice to heart.  I have Alain to thank for making it possible for me to visit Horseshoe Bend on two occasions separated by 2 and 3/4 years.  The first visit was a few days prior to attending the Canyon de Chelly workshop in Chinle in March 2004.  I decided to visit the Page area for some additional photography before I set out for Chinle.  My experience with landscape photography was very limited as I was transitioning from an intensive effort in astrophotography.  My gear at the time was a Pentax 67 and a Canon 10D.  The 10D gave me the confidence that the landscape photography learning curve could now be climbed at a much faster pace, and so I enrolled in Alain's de Chelly workshop.  Of course, the only Horseshoe Bend images I had seen prior to my visit were Alain's, so my visualization was stuck in a "copy-cat" mode at the time.  The best effort from that trip can be seen below.

The second visit to Horseshoe Bend was the result of attending the Digital Fine Art Sumit in November 2006.  The attendees visited Horseshoe Bend on two occasions for early morning photography.  My approach was very different than 3 years ago and the result can be seen below. 

Now I am not going to comment on the qualities of each individual photo.  You can make your own artistic and technical judgments.  For me, this has been an exercise in exploring the technical and artistic approaches that only time has influenced.  The location is exactly the same and the lighting conditions are nearly identical as they should be on clear mornings on the high plateau.  The only thing different is me....well and some camera gear.  But really the main difference is me. These differences are in how I am now visualizing the image compared to two years ago.  So much has influenced me over those two years, but hopefully the most important influence has been the discovery of my own personal style.  The influences are too numerous to mention, but I think it is important to state that in the nearly 3 year period I attended 5 workshops with Alain and Natalie and also studied in Alain's One on One Consultation program. 

For me there is a marked difference in visualization.  How do I want the viewer to become involved in the image?  As Ansel wrote, "there are always two people in the photograph; you and the viewer."  How am I now visualizing a scene that takes into account the viewers' point of view?  The photographs speak for themselves and you can determine how I may have changed over the years in my approach to visualization. 

I simply was not capable of taking the November 2006 image in March of 2003.  Whether you like the images or not, I do believe you would agree that they show a radical change in visualization and final presentation.  Landscape photography is such an incredibly stimulating art form.  Subtle camera movements or contrast control can make the biggest difference in an image and I look forward to continuing my skill development in these areas. 

If you are not incorporating the "revisit to a familiar location" skill enhancement exercise, I encourage you to do so.  It provides a wonderful way to reflect upon the photographic influences from visit to visit and may help you better define your own personal photographic style.  At least it will provide a benchmark upon which you can evaluate your photography with regards to visualization, digital technique, image optimization, and personal style. 

Best wishes in your own photographic pursuits. 

You may purchase a  print of Horseshoe Bend 2006 image here. 

You may also read another article related to this photograph here:  "What do you do?"

Horseshoe Bend (March 2004) Pentax 6x7 with 55mm lens and Provia transparency	Horseshoe Bend (November 2006) Canon 5D with 24mm tilt/shift for a 3 frame panoramic vertical stitch